Columbus Syndrome: How Cross-Cultural Training Went Wrong (and What Leaders Should Do Instead)

Why half-baked culture training still gets leaders lost—and how embracing complexity can reshape leadership for the future.

Columbus did not pass the cross-cultural training perhaps

Picture this. You’re in a glossy corporate training room in Frankfurt, Singapore, or New York. On the table are neatly stacked binders with the grand title “Cross-Cultural Training for Global Managers.” The facilitator, sleeves rolled up and eyes sparkling with PowerPoint zeal, begins with a flourish:

“Indians are collectivist, Americans are individualistic, Japanese avoid confrontation, and Germans… well, Germans love precision.”

Cue polite nods. Cue several pages of notes scribbled by ambitious executives armed with HR-issued pens. Cue the quiet voice in the back of your head whispering: “Really? An entire nation of a billion-plus people, summed up in one adjective?”

Welcome to the business world’s favourite pastime: flattening whole civilisations into bullet points for easy digestion. It’s like reducing fine wine to “red” or “white.” Or reducing Picasso to “likes blue.”

And it’s here—right at this spot—that Eclectic Leadership™ walks in, crosses its arms, and says, “No thanks. We’re cross with cross-cultural training.”

When Cultural Training Builds Walls Instead of Bridges

Let’s get right to the punchline: those glossy workshops meant to bridge cultures often end up cementing new walls instead.

How ironic: in trying to make us “more culturally competent,” they hand us boxes pre-labelled with tidy stereotypes. Under the broad brushstroke of culture, nuance is erased, and whole nations are reduced to caricatures.

Take India as an example—because nothing makes the point like real data.

• Population: 1.5 billion.

• Age distribution: 24% children, 68% working age, 7% over 65.

• Urban-rural split: 31.14% urban, 68.86% rural.

• Gender ratio: 106.45 males for every 100 females.

• LGBTQ+ population: 10–17%.

• Every major world religion represented.

• Linguistic diversity: 22 official languages, 121 major languages, 270 mother tongues. Only Papua New Guinea is more linguistically diverse.

• Ethnic groups: Over 2,000.

• Scheduled Tribes: 705, comprising 8.6% of the population.

But sure, let’s just call it “Indian Culture,” smile knowingly, and imagine we’ve cracked the code. Label applied, complexity erased.

It’s not cultural understanding. It’s cultural harakiri.

The Western Lens Problem

Here’s the snag: most cross-cultural frameworks are built through a western lens. They chop the world into over-simplified cultural “blocks”: Indian, Chinese, African. As if continents and countries were monolithic Lego pieces that managers can simply click together.

This isn’t bridging. It’s colouring-in.

It reduces living, breathing people into static archetypes that fit neatly into corporate binders. And in doing so, it teaches managers not to see people, but to pre-sort them.

We don’t need more tick-box anthropology. We need leadership models that embrace complexity, rather than suffocating it under a PowerPoint template.

When Columbus Attended Cross-Cultural Training (Sort Of)

If you think this problem is new, think again. Let’s travel back to 1492, when Christopher Columbus essentially sat through the earliest (and perhaps worst) recorded cross-cultural training. The session must have gone something like this:

• Target destination: India.

• Key takeaway: Expect spices, silks, and trade routes.

• Navigation advice: Just head west, you can’t miss it.

Armed with this stellar briefing, Columbus set sail. Except he missed India entirely and landed in the Caribbean. A spectacular case of “close but no cigar.”

Here’s the kicker: instead of admitting his cultural compass was wildly off, he simply slapped the label “Indians” on the people he encountered. Voila — a geographical blunder turned into centuries of misnaming, thanks to training that valued speed and simplicity over depth and accuracy.

Sound familiar? Managers today may not be renaming continents, but they’re still reducing vast, complex civilisations into one-size-fits-all labels. It’s what we call Columbus Syndrome: when a simplistic cultural lens gets applied with total confidence, and generations suffer the consequences.

Bad training didn’t just change a workshop outcome — it literally changed the course of history. And it’s still changing corporate outcomes today.

Enter Eclectic Leadership™: An Inside-Out, Bottom-Up Approach

So what do we do differently?

Eclectic Leadership™ doesn’t start with nations, categories or labels. We start with people. Human beings. The ones who can’t be fully explained by a laminate sheet of “do’s and don’ts about X culture.”

We use two lenses: roles and layers.

1. Roles: More Than a Job Title

Companies tend to define people by one role: “manager,” “engineer,” “trainee.” It’s neat, it’s tidy, and it’s woefully inaccurate.

Because each individual juggles multiple roles—familial, social, communal, religious, civil. A daughter, a son, a carer, a volunteer, a neighbour, a breadwinner, a campaigner.

These roles coexist, overlap, and clash. They influence decisions, behaviours, and relationships far more than a training slide suggesting “Indians value collectivism.” Unless we acknowledge and address the multiplicity of roles each person carries, we’re barely scratching the surface.

2. Layers: The Seen and the Unseen

Then come the layers. Some are visible: skin colour, gender, clothing. These are the dangerous ones—the ones we use to generalise at a glance.

But beneath them lie deeper, invisible layers. Values. Beliefs. Life experiences. Personal trauma. Secret ambitions. Internal contradictions. Layers that only emerge through conversation, discovery, and authentic connection.

Unless both roles and layers are engaged, cross-cultural training is nothing more than a top-down, outside-in box-ticking exercise. With Eclectic Leadership™, we flip the model: inside-out, bottom-up, human-first.

“Cultural Safari” Workshops

Have you ever noticed how many cross-cultural trainings resemble a “cultural safari”? You know the type:

“Observe the Japanese manager in their natural habitat. Notice how they bow instead of shaking hands. Remark on the elusive trait known as ‘saving face.’ Watch carefully, for in their world, silence is not awkward—it is respect.”

Cue corporate trainers handing out safari hats and binoculars.

This exoticising lens reduces people to creatures of curiosity rather than collaborators of complexity. And it perpetuates a colonial hangover: them, observed by us. A power dynamic masquerading as empathy.

Eclectic Leadership™ is the antidote. It says: we don’t need safaris, we need symphonies. Roles and layers weaving together into music, not exhibits.

Why Diversity and Inclusion Aren’t “Add-Ons”

Here’s another problem with today’s DEI tick-box culture: too often, it’s bolted onto organisations after the fact. A patch stitched onto a system that was never designed with real inclusion in mind.

Eclectic Leadership™ doesn’t add DEI as seasoning sprinkled at the end. It bakes diversity, inclusion, and belonging into the recipe from the start. When you focus on roles and layers—when you start with people and context rather than stereotypes—then inclusion is inherent, not imposed.

To put it differently: corporate DEI often feels like painting rainbows on concrete. Eclectic Leadership™? It’s growing gardens in rich soil.

Why This Matters (The Business Case, Because HR Will Ask)

Now, let’s address the sceptics. The ones already saying: “Yes, but where’s the ROI?” Don’t worry—we have you covered.

According to Deloitte, inclusive companies are twice as likely to meet or exceed financial targets. McKinsey’s research shows that ethnically diverse companies outperform their peers by 36% in profitability. The Harvard Business Review has found that cognitively diverse teams solve problems faster.

But here’s the kicker: these outcomes don’t come from box-ticking DEI initiatives or bland cross-cultural workshops. They come from precisely the kind of human-centric, bottom-up approaches that Eclectic Leadership™ embodies. When people feel seen beyond the labels, they perform beyond expectations.

The Kaleidoscope vs. the Paintbrush

Think of culture as a kaleidoscope. Twist it, and patterns shift endlessly—each rotation revealing new combinations.

Traditional training, however, treats culture like a paintbrush. One colour for “India.” Another for “Germany.” A block here, a block there, neat and simple. Except the real world is never neat, and certainly never simple.

Eclectic Leadership™ is about looking through the kaleidoscope—acknowledging that reality is complex, changing, and utterly unflattenable. Why settle for one brushstroke when you could have thousands of shifting patterns?

Why Leaders Need to Get This—Now

Let’s be blunt. The leaders clinging to outdated cross-cultural models will be tomorrow’s dinosaurs.

The workforce is younger, more vocal, more intersectional, and more globally mobile than ever before. A 25-year-old software engineer in Bangalore may be leading a team in Berlin, collaborating with colleagues in Nairobi, and reporting to a manager in Toronto. Do you think a checklist that says “Indians are collectivist” is going to help her navigate that reality?

Leaders who fail to adapt will lose credibility, relevance, and—ultimately—talent.

And here’s the subtle FOMO you were waiting for: the organisations that embrace Eclectic Leadership™ now are already building the leadership DNA of the future. The rest? They’ll be left asking why their best people keep leaving for firms that actually get it.

A Glimpse Inside The Eclectic Leadership™ Movement

Without giving too much away (because discovery is half the point), here’s what people say when they experience Eclectic Leadership™ for the first time:

• “I realised that my team members are not just ‘employees’ but layered human beings whose personal roles deeply influence their work.”

• “This isn’t DEI training that feels bolted on. It’s leadership that makes inclusion the default.”

• “I came away questioning the labels I’ve unconsciously applied to people for years.”

• “It feels less like training, more like rewiring my leadership approach from the inside out.”

It’s not about replacing culture. It’s about surfacing the richness already there.

The Future Is Eclectic

So, let’s circle back to that corporate training room we started in. The binders, the bullet points, the bland reductions of entire nations into stereotypes.

Imagine instead a different session. No gloss, no labels, no tick boxes. Just leaders sitting down, exploring their own roles and layers, and discovering how those interplay with the roles and layers of others.

Suddenly, the conversation isn’t about “how to manage Indians” or “how to talk to Germans.” It’s about how to lead humans.

That’s the pivot. That’s the breakthrough. That’s the future.

---

If you’ve ever sat in a cultural training workshop and felt, deep down, that something was missing—if you’ve ever left a DEI talk questioning why it felt hollow—then you already know. You’ve felt the gap.

Eclectic Leadership™ fills it.

But this isn’t something to read about; it’s something to experience. It’s a shift, a mindset, a practice. And once you’ve seen through the kaleidoscope, you can never go back to paintbrushes.

So here’s the invitation: Stay curious. Look deeper. Ask yourself not just about culture, but about roles and layers. And if you’re ready to explore leadership that outgrows labels and lives in complexity, step into the Eclectic Leadership™ Movement.

Because the future will not reward those who settle for simplification. It will reward those bold enough to embrace complexity.

The question is: will you be one of them?

Yours faithfully,

Shehzaad Shams,

London, 3rd September 2025